Of course you did since you can't understand that not mentioning God is not the same as saying He doesn't exist, even though you do it every day.


And you examine artifacts without using the scientific method? You compare sources without using the scientific method?

That's because according to the Discovery Institute and apparently you, "scientifically demonstrating the others are impossible" is best done at school boards and among elected officials and not with scientists. Obviously the evidence is so strong that we should just bypass the people who understand biology and go right to the people who don't.

Since you never really provided a refutation of any of the steps associated with abiogenesis theory, I don't see how you can make the "incompatible baby-steps" proclamation and expect me to accept it without some evidence supplied by you.

You mean the atoms just continue to get larger? So much for my chemistry knowledge. I actually thought they added atoms to the crystal structure in order to increase the physical size of the crystal.
Since the atoms themselves get physically bigger (as you alluded to) have they ever grown a diamond atom big enough that they could see the nucleus and the electrons?

Of course the amino acids that we found on meteorites were made by man and sent into space so that it would look like they were naturally occurring.
It's too bad you and Answers can't tell the difference between an experiment set up to mimic naturally occurring environments from one that is set up to manufacture a particular product. Perhaps you could provide the research report from one of those experiments that resulted in the "man made" replicating molecules. Then you could point out for me exactly which part of the controls or environment set up are improper.