CTD there appears to be little of actual substance in our discussions at the moment. That's what I'd like to focus on -- substance. I'll let you and LinearAQ discuss abiogenesis here without interfering since you are making some of the same points to me and I would give you similar answers to him.

I will tame the sarcasm if you agree to start backing up your assertions with evidence. That is, after all, the basis of science, whoever is doing it. If you make a claim then you need some evidence for it. If you challenge an existing claim then you need some evidence for it.

George Washington Carver: great man. Knew and taught a lot about agriculture. It seems to me that this could co-exist quite easily with creationism because it does not involve evidence about fossils, geology, astronomy, biology or genetics.