I noticed something about abiogenesis: There's no testable hypothesis for it. At first, I tried to concoct one and failed, then I googled for it and after reading quite a few links I'm satisfied that nobody else has done any better.

Now if ID and CS must be classed as unscientific because some of the historical events they accept aren't testable, evolutionism is in no better shape.

I have some thoughts on the limits of scientifically examining history, and they probably belong in another topic. First, I'll wait & see if the local evolutionists can agree that abiogenesis is untestable...

Who knows? Maybe there's something I missed - maybe the testable hypothesis is elusive rather than nonexistant.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson