Quote
It seems to me there's another language spoken by evolutionists. They call one-celled organisms "simple", and they call snowflakes "complex".

I guess that's what it takes to call evolutionism "science", eh?

I wonder how much chance there is that a melting snowflake will spring to life as its complexity diminishes and it becomes a more simple form. At some point, shouldn't it contain as little information as a lifeform? Okay, I don't actually wonder very much.

I did not say cells were "simple" nor did I compare them to snowflakes. The snowflake example was to show that God can put rules in place that don't require Him to form every chemical bond with His own hands.

That said, I find your post to be little but an attempt to insult me along with all who consider evolution to be a viable theory, implying we are stupid or liars. So, I am requesting that you post something that is at least on topic and is also not a thinly veiled insult. I got a single and final warning for my behavior so I would expect Mr Tanner to hold you to the same standard. I would hate to see you forced out if we were having a good debate.

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke