Now let's see if I understand this: Dr Gonzalez' astronomy was a threat to evolutionism? That's what the evolutionists are saying, but it looks like in their haste to persecute they forgot something: their own bogus claim that "evolution is separate". The story's supposed to go cosmic evolution > stellar evolution > chemical evolution > prebiotic evolution > evolution. They're not supposed to be concerned about protecting anything but the last one.

But they are. I don't think it's properly called a conspiracy. Conspiracies are secret. This is open ideological warfare. Actions speak louder than words, and it's pretty clear that none of those evolutionists consider their "theory of evolution" to be concerned only with what happens after life "evolves into existence".

They draw these artificial little lines in order to call creationists ignorant, but they forget the line exists in no time if they perceive a chance to hurt an enemy of their dogma. If the line had any meaning to them at all, they couldn't view Dr. G. as an enemy. His book was about the planet!

I'll try to remember this the next time a creationist is mocked for ignoring the imaginary line between abiogenesis & evolutionism, or even big bang & evolutionism. By their actions they themselves make it abundantly clear that questioning any part of the story threatens the whole story.