Actually I read the link and there is a preponderous amount of evidence that he is discriminated against because of his religious beliefs.

I guess we can use those two examples as reason to disqualify non-christians, wiccans, evolutionists, homosexuals etc, from teaching in Christian schools or being hired by Christian organizations then.

All in all, I then have to wonder why you seem to feel discriminated against by Christians. It's like this I guess, according to the rules you approve of... either change the way you think or get lost.

Why do you take issue with that attitude if you approve of it yourself? It's easy to see why people like you fear having Christians in positions of leadership. It would mean that the Christians could use all of the examples set by non-Christians as a basis to eradicate non-christian thinking from the public sphere. If you are so opposed to that idea in context of christians doing it, why do you approve of others who do the same thing?

Why, in particular, do you take issue with my strongly held beliefs, Linda, when you have just set forth these examples as appropriate? Is there any particular reason why I should bend over backwards to accept your beliefs, based on what you yourself believe?

Back to suffering,, though the careers of these two scientists have obviously suffered due to their religious beliefs, a great victory has been won by Christians who can now use these two examples as reason to disqualify people who believe in evolution from teaching their nonsense in Christian schools.