Linda, I have just about had a guts full of your ongoing criticisms of my posting method abilities (or lack of). You assume anytime I type anything in opposition to your beliefs, that I am copying and pasting. You have already been caught out before by putting down the apparent "author" of my post, and finding out it was me! You assumed I had copied and pasted that as well and then had to make an apology for it. When is this going to stop? I have told you that my posts are often in my own words, based on my own beliefs. I have used copying and pasting before yes, and sometimes do, and I cannot imagine everybody on this forum has not. If I have trouble with something , I may THEN go and check it out further and read it before I go and post. I have also watched videos and read books. Now you're saying links and websites are not proof of anything.....what is? You put one up yourself if I'm not mistaken on someone anti Hovind who stated all his apparent lies? Am I mistaken here?????? Have I not seen you do the same?
I can't quite figure out what you want. You complain about not having the links/websites to confirm, and yet when they are given (Russ for example has given them and websites), you then complain you haven't got time to go and read them and now you're saying they're not proof of anything. what on earth do you want Linda? You are constantly putting down someone's method of posting and anything they cite (unless it comes from your sources).
Is it just me that finds this bewildering? Something I am not getting here? I am not on debate forums Linda, so I had no idea there was a certain critique to posting and obviously whatever it is I'm doing or not doing is just not working out on here. Can anybody else tell me what is wrong with my posting methods other than Linda please?
Should I just discontinue posting if I am not conforming to the correct debate critique?. Posting in my own words doesn't work, I'm accused continually of copying and pasting. Putting up links and websites is now invalid. Are my home videos and books also invalid when it comes to Linda's observations? I'm finding a mass of contradictory wants from you Linda. Is everybody to walk around on broken glass with you all the time? I guess so. I wonder that anybody has any patience with you.
Hence the source of my comments that the ignoramus, who claims to have taught high school physics, thinks the sun burns by combustion. I could cite over 100 other examples of where he's got his science wrong and why he is not the qualified expert he claims to be.
Where would you cite this from Linda? any websites by any chance?
I'm giving this a rest tonight and will try to respond to the rest of your post tommorrow if I can be bothered actually going through anymore of this with you.