You are just so much fun, Russ, posting all these PRATTs. Always good for a laugh eh? Some people are just soooo gullible! You must welcome them here eh?
Only since human fossils appeared in the fossil record some 6 million to 200,000 years ago ... depending on your definitions of "human" and "dinosaur" ... by one common definition I had dinosaur thigh for dinner.

http://www.livescience.com/animals/070412_dino_tissues.html
So, one wonders, does it taste like chicken?

Referring to large dinosaurs that died out in the K-T extinction event:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH710.html
I have been to Paluxy and put my foot in a dinosaur footprint that I cleaned out with my own hands:

<img src="http://razd.evcforum.net/Pictures/CvE/Slide6.JPG">

There are not even any footprints at Paluxy small enough to fit the biggest human, to say nothing about the shapes being all wrong.

There were no human footprints there. There have been hoax footprints (admitted by the perpetrator), hoaxes that keep getting perpetuated by creationist sites ... and now we get to play the "who keeps using hoaxes" game.

Hint #1:
Hoaxes uncovered by creationists = 0
Hoaxes uncovered by scientists = most
Hoaxes uncovered by media reporters, etc. = some

The textbooks teach that most dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago and that humans appeared in the fossil record some 6 million to 200,000 years ago, depending on your definition of "human". This is true, as most but not all died out. We are fairly certain that all the BIG dinosaurs died out at that time, but birds are dinosaurs, chickens are dinosaurs.

Surprisingly public school textbooks, ie up to high school, are not written by scientists, but by lay people working for an editor that wants to please parents in order to sell the most textbooks.

Surprisingly public school textbooks, ie up to high school, are not selected or even evaluated by scientists for accuracy or use, they are predominantly selected by parent groups that help set the curriculum with the teachers.

NOT surprisingly there are a lot of errors and misinformation in textbooks.

Here's a group that perpetuates such errors
http://www.textbookaccuracy.org/

Here's a review of public school textbooks
http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/Teachers/sciencebookerror.html

So if you want to blame the textbooks for a bad education, then you need to blame the people that make the textbooks and the people that choose them, especially the people that know little about the actual science in question that are involved in those decisions. Like most parents (even those with science PhDs are not experts in all branches of science, dentists are not biologists).

Bullfrog.

A good source of creationist lies. You should have stopped with the second word. Fact: Hovind is in jail for fraud, why should he be trusted?

Fact: Hovind has lied about evolution and several other things, why should he be trusted?
http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Pier/1766/hovindlies/
http://www.kent-hovind.com/statistics.htm
That is just the beginning.

The real question - relates to that hoax issue above - is why creationists need to lie at all if creationism is true?

Related to that is why do creation websites never remove lies (or hoaxes) from their websites once they have been shown to be lies (or hoaxes)?

Seriously people -- why do creationists need to lie and repeat lies and perpetuate lies if creationism is true?

Enjoy

[color:"green"]Note: my time is limited, so I only choose threads of particular interest to me and I cannot guarantee a reply to all responses (particularly if they do not discuss the issue/s), and I expect other people to do the same. Thank you for your consideration.[/color]