|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,153
Master Elite Member
|
Linda, the opinion of one or even a few remote people of reknown are not all that valuable given the enormity of the deception and false science concerned.
One example. .. I for instance. was taught through high school that man decended from apes. I remember well the little drawings in textbooks presented to show how man made this transition.
Is that still the same theory of evolution that is being taught today? How is that one idea actually beneficial to biology or any other branch of science? Or, has the idea, planted as a concrete unarguable scientific fact in the minds of many people, actually caused them to stumble repeatedly looking for clues to answers to questions about life in many of the wrong places?
As a comparison, lets say you needed some money. Would it be more effective to go and get a job or would it be more effective trying to convince yourself that somewhere in your house there must be a bag containing a million dollars and so spend your time trying to find it instead of going out and simply earning a paycheck in a manner that is well known to succeed?
because that essentially is what evolutionists have done... claimed for years and years to have all the answers... the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow... but when you actually get there, the pot is empty. Until that point you don't realize that your years and years of learning and hearing about the pot of gold you were seeking were all in vain.
That is what evolution has done to many people engaging in scientific pursuits. When new discoveries are actually made, they are made independently or simply suddenly show up because someone was observing in the right place at the right time, causing evolution to be rewritten and re-theorized over and over.
That is exactly why theory should not be taught as scientific fact. No other field of science allows that.
|
|
|
|
|