|
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 30,867
Master Elite Member
|
Why are evolutionists slow to give up their beliefs in light of compelling creationist science?[color:"brown"] "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives."[/color] Tolstoy 1828-1910 As quoted in "Chaos: Making A New Science", James Gleick You see, ironically, to believe evolution is to misunderstand human nature. What is wrong with the idea that evolution is God's way of doing the building? Whether or not I believed in God, I would not accept the myth of evolution. It is astounding that people actually accept that small machines (cells) self-assemble into complex, symmetrical, self-reproducing machines (humans). It is on par with believing that a computer, left on for a long enough time will acquire more complex software. There is nothing I've ever encountered that is as ridiculous and more against true science, which I happen to love. Remember the fundamentals.Evolution does not attempt to explain how life began, but what happened to it once it did. That depends on which "brand" of evolution you are having faith in. Have you ever heard of chemical evolution? You told me that you believe that rocks can turn into mankind given enough time.Surely looking at the evidence and interpreting it is better than trying to explain it away? True, but there is no evidence for cell-to-man evolution. Neither is there for rock-to-cell evolution. Believing either of these religions requires a level of delusion that I cannot attain.
|
|
|
|
|
