[color:"brown"]You said that Kent's credentials are fake[/color]. Here is the quote:

[color:"red"]"The point I was making about Hovind is that his credentials are fake."[/color]

Now you are modifying your position to this:

[color:"red"]"Hovind´s PhD clearly does not meet even minimally respectable academic standards"[/color]

There's a big difference, so in reference to being respectable, unless you can qualify your statement without backpedaling or coloring the "perception" of your very words, then Kent deserves a sincere apology from you.

---

[color:"brown"]Amazingly, when I first called you on this last night, Laura and I agreed that your tactic would be to question the definition of "fake".[/color]

I'm not kidding.

You're beginning to sound more like Bill Clinton, you know; He doesn't inhale either.

---

Now, please just admit that you were wrong here Linda because otherwise, there is just no respectable way to squirm out of this.