|
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 30,867
Master Elite Member
|
I have heard him on his videos state that he was a high school physics teacher. He did not qualify that by explaining that he would have been teaching his brand of "creation science" in non-mainstream schools. Mainstream schools would not employ someone to teach science who did not have a scientific degree; his bachelor's was in "education and Bible."
His doctorate degree is from a diploma mill. I'm sorry Linda. I'm just not letting you off the hook that easily. You are not being honest here. You are clearly backpedaling (again) and trying to convince this forum (and likely yourself) that you didn't say something that you actually did say. Now you've been dishonest twice. (In truth, you've made many similar posts about Kent's credentials, but I'm being kind here.) This is immoral. You made false statements about someone that reflects on their character. Now the proper thing to do is to be honest and admit what you've done. [color:"brown"] You said that Kent's credentials are fake[/color]. Here is the quote: [color:"red"] "The point I was making about Hovind is that his credentials are fake."[/color] Now you are modifying your position to this:[color:"red"] "Hovindīs PhD clearly does not meet even minimally respectable academic standards"[/color] There's a big difference, so in reference to being respectable, unless you can qualify your statement without backpedaling or coloring the "perception" of your very words, then Kent deserves a sincere apology from you.
|
|
|
|
|
