Quote
People also are devoutly Christian, believe in Jesus, and accept evolution. 11,000 Christian leaders in the US have signed a petition saying that Christianity and evolution can happily co-exist.

What is it they say? "The truth shall set you free."


Be very careful of this kind of stuff folks. The evolutionist attempts to appeal to the Christian by saying "both can exist"....they know full well, that the indoctrination of evolution has actually destroyed MANY a Christian's faith around the world. In fact, here in New Zealand, the evolution faith has been nothing short of devastating. 95% of kids now leave the church and ditch their faith after hearing about evolution in highschool. Not even having had the chance to hear the creation side.

Though some people decide to compromise and keep both onboard, for many it doesn't quite work that way. Thankfully, more and more Christians are hearing the creation side to the arguments and are having their faith restored and this is slowly beginning to spread.

Had evolution REALLY had the truth, these arguments wouldn't even be erupting in the first place because the truth would have overwhelming solid evidence. Basically it would not even be possible! It would be like denying there is a sun in the sky.

There have been plenty of evolutionary scientists who have become creationists too, so perhaps the truth has set them free! Certainly through their studies, they continued to see undeniable design! Not an easy transition, considering it can take years to accept it when you have a mindset towards evolution. It took Dr Gary Parker 3 years to make the transition. He had been teaching evolution to kids for many years. This is no an isolated case.

The "truth" Linda speaks of that will "set you free", is simply a theory, and their interpretation of what took place in the beginning, even though they were not there, is down to faith. They appeal greatly to the ego of the wanna be academics, and stroke the antigod philosophy egos of their peers and rely heavily on the ignorance of the ordinary layperson.

By using technical terms, making it all "sound" scientific and logical, people get overwhelmed and starry eyed and are almost intimidated to question it. Linda is a little caught up in her own academic verbosity, including those of her superiors.

We NEED other highly intelligent scientists who have already been down the road of evolution, know all the tricks played, the denials, exaggerations, cover ups, great use of scientific terminology to be able to expose it all for what it REALLY is. Without them, we really are sitting ducks. Just watch a nature programme and how they speak of evolution as though it really happened, without ANY photographic evidence to support it. The only reality you see is the present or recorded past, the rest is the evolution story tale and sadly many people are falling for it.