Just a few points here. I was ignoring this thread because I have no interest in Biblical quibbles, but I can see now that people have been posting anti-evolution things here while I've been refuting them elsewhere.

There are so many scientific errors here that I don't know where to begin. Remember the reasons I gave for not refuting entire websites and videos; it takes hours, and only seconds for someone to post a link. You guys are cutting and pasting stuff from creationist sites and a lot of it is wrong but I don't have days to refute every point.

Since I've been asking people to back up their comments about absolute dating methods, I'll start with those when I get a chance. I'll also talk about mitochondrial Adam and Eve because Bex has posted some initial correct facts about them and then some comments which have either been misinterpreted from the data, or completely made up. Guess I'll move on from there as I get the time.

Also, a point about quote mining. I hope I've shown enough about this to prove that it is a dishonest process. These quotes are taken out of context, cherry-picked (e.g. a sentence extracted here and there from a whole paragraph), or are outdated -- in the sense that they are no longer relevant to current scientific thinking. An example I gave of this was Darwin saying there was a lack of evidence 150 years ago. There is a lot more evidence now.

People who quote-mine are deliberately trying to mislead people about what scientists are saying. If you endorse this process then I think you need to ask yourself why you also want to engage in the dishonest process of misrepresenting people's views. Is your desire to promote creationism so all-consuming that you feel you need to put together these lies in order to do it? And is that your brand of Christianity? Does "Thou shalt not bear false witness" have a qualifier attached -- "unless you're trying to get people to become creationists"?