So if you want to discuss facts we need to specify that the important ones to discuss are the ones that invalidate concepts, the others are trivial and a waste of time.
The existence of Jerusalem does not invalidate evolution. If Jesus were a historical figure, that does not invalidate evolution. The history of the tribes of Israel does not invalidate it. So discussing these things in a debate about evolution is trivial and a waste of time.
The existence of fossils is much more pertinent to a discussion of evolution, as are the places in which they are found. Would you like to make a point about how you think fossils invalidate evolution?
