That's fine, if people are tired of me asking them. There have been no satisfactory answers here, no models proposed for how various geological features came to exist (or not) on a young earth or from a global flood. I'm sorry these are vexing points but they need to be asked of a "theory" that people want taught in schools as an alternative to the existing ones. Do you think intelligent high school students with a decent science education are not going to be asking them as well -- or is it the idea that we don't educate them in science so that they never ask these inconvenient questions in the first place?

Should I ask about the feasible size of the ark? Some more questions about the flood and geology? Or we could move on to Bex's assertion that the Grand Canyon could have been carved in a very short time. I'd still like to hear evidence for how the geologic column and fossil sorting are fakes or lies, and how radioisotope dating is wrong, because these things strongly underpin scientific theories about the old earth and evolution. C'mon guys, if you've got good evidence against them you can shut me up.