Hi, sorry I should have gone into that more. Linda's earlier quote from evolutionists regarding sealife and the snigger about us believing that they simply "drowned" in the flood needs to be explained.

Much of the sealife would have survived the flood obviously, but those that were killed very suddenly due to the catastrophic speed, becoming trapped under sediment, (sometimes hundreds of feet thick) racing, covering and compressing at explosive speed. E.g. Grand Canyon was ripped out in a matter of hours, some say minutes. In fact, after the Mt St Helen's eruption in the 1980s, a mini grand canyon was formed 1/40th size in a matter of hours, hundreds of feet high with thousands of self sorting layers rapidly formed. So much for the evolutionary idea of millions of years formation and erosion!

But back to the sealife. There are fish fossils that show clear evidence of having been buried quickly by water-born sediments which sealed them off from the air swiftly before they could decay, preserving each perfectly in rapidly hardening sandstone. One is in the act of swallowing a victim and another is giving birth. The third, a jelly fish, which literally melts away in days, is one of millions found scattered over thousands of square kilometres in South Australia, fossilised rapdily into sandstone after a massive flood.

Noah only needed to take one pair of every land breathing animal into the ark. And each animal did not have to be "adults" either. They laugh at the idea of dinosaurs on the ark, but don't seem to understand that dinosaurs like anything else, take many many years to get to the size they are capable of reaching (like crocs who just keep growing). Very easily dealt with, get a young dinosaur or a baby (or eggs). No sweat. I have no issue believing dinosaurs were on the ark at all. There have also been sightings of land breathing dinosaurs too, not just "nesse", so certainly it is possible.