Pictures are the easiest things in the world to fake. How do you prove anything about a photo on the internet, one way or the other? Better evidence is needed.
I think the idea of living pterodactyls is frankly insane. I do believe it's possible that there are creatures on the earth which have not been "discovered" by science, i.e. "bigfoot." But even if the Loch Ness Monster were proved to exist, how is this evidence for creation? So some "primitive" creatures survived in an ecological niche? There's nothing contrary to evolution here. It's creationists looking around trying to find "proof" that evolution is wrong, along the lines of Hovind claiming that fire-breathing dragons must exist because Revelation says so.
