Quote
Yes, it is one incredible book filled with baseless assertions like "Most living creatures and some plants have individually designed eyes."
An of course, "Obviously, it has taken more than natural selection of random events to produce and optimize so many different eye designs. In technology work, increasing complexity often requires more intelligence, planning, and power." Yet he doesn't back this up with anything at all.
Here's another interesting assertion: "If one takes the probability of each necessary cell occurring, it approaches a near impossibility, but putting an eye together with the cells as a given or starting point also provides a near impossible probability." This claim is made but no supporting calculation or baseline information is provided. I would hope that he is not relying on that probability fiasco that Bill Dembski put out.
See how good it is? Just look how much <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/taz.gif" alt="" /> it can stir up in an evolutionist!

I only know of one type of eye design this site lacks. I haven't been able to find it anywhere on the internet, but I may try again. It's a periscope design with reflectors, and it's found in the deepest parts of the ocean where there's almost no light.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson