Yes, it is one incredible book filled with baseless assertions like "Most living creatures and some plants have individually designed eyes."
An of course, "Obviously, it has taken more than natural selection of random events to produce and optimize so many different eye designs. In technology work, increasing complexity often requires more intelligence, planning, and power." Yet he doesn't back this up with anything at all.
Here's another interesting assertion: "If one takes the probability of each necessary cell occurring, it approaches a near impossibility, but putting an eye together with the cells as a given or starting point also provides a near impossible probability." This claim is made but no supporting calculation or baseline information is provided. I would hope that he is not relying on that probability fiasco that Bill Dembski put out.