This is a strange dichotomy. I've only just stated that evolution does not describe how life began. I've given several definitions of it here already.

Creationists ceaselessly ask for proof of evolution. They try to poke holes in their opponents' positions. Why? Because if made to give evidence for their own, it is sorely lacking. My challenge remains to any creationists here to give convincing evidence that creation explains the observable world better than evolution. Remember that even if evolution were hypothetically discredited tomorrow, this does not by default mean creation is the truth. You need to give evidence for your position.