I've been over all that. I also talked about Behe's mousetrap and linked off to a page with more details, plus pictures of the simpler mousetraps that functioned with parts rearranged. I also linked to a scientific paper explaining how the eye evolved, and how there are organisms alive today that have functional eyes which reflect each step. What part of this is not clear to you?

There is plenty of evidence for evolution. I see none for creation. If you are going to continue to refuse to give it, and tell me that you simply know better than I do, then I think there's no point in carrying on with this discussion. I'll let others be the judges of how credible Hovind's claims are and whether or not the scientist refuting them in the examples I gave is lying.