|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,977
Master Elite Member
|
Bex I'm sure Pwcca can and will speak for himself, but I have views on this too and I would like to share them.
You seem to want creationism given equal weight in the science curriculum to evolution. The main problem with this is that one is religion and one is science. You are doing your best to convince yourself as well as everyone else that creationism has science to it (it doesn't), and evolution is equatable with religion -- it isn't, there's plenty of proof for it across many different scientific disciplines. It is about as close to certain as anything can get. Good scientisis will always be open to new data and new interpretations, but they are not going to come from creationism. If you want to continue to argue that creationism is scientific in any way, and that evolution is not factual, I will be happy to discuss any examples you care to give.
Linda.
|
|
|
|
|