So, are any of you upset at the misrepresentation that took place regarding the ancient Mayans? There are children who had to go home studying and memorizing for tests on these cultures and decades later we find out it was all false. The very same could be true about lots of dated information. It would've been better if the history books had said "All current evidence suggests these people were passive but we're not entirely sure." But they didn't! They flat out said "this was a fact. Learn this. Memorize this. Get an 'A' on your test about the ancient Mayans."

So, just out of polite curiosity, does this sort of fallicy in the history books bother you? Or not really?

Why am I saying this? Am I saying this to be rude and nasty and just plain argumentative? Not at all. But to say you simply want the allaged falsehoods taken out of the text books suggests you're concerned with misinformation and that the recording of accurate data is your agenda, rather than religious motivation.

I know this is a Creation & Evolution forum, but just for the record, are you interested in other (non-religious) false facts in history and science books? There's an awful lot, you'd be surprised.