I haven't seen a class of biology teaching evolution coupled with the big bang and abiogenesis. And in astronomy or whatever classes when they are presented, they are presented as theories, not scientific fact.
I don't know what you guys are talking about, but evolution is fact for the scientific community
I am curious to where you guys get the info that most of evolution has been disproved (credible links?)
Anyways the beauty of evolution is it raises consciousness not just in biology but in other fields, skepticism about just attributing the things we don't understand to a designer just because we think it is too improbable.

Creationists who attempt to deploy the argument from improbability in their favour always assume that biological adaptation is a question of the jackpot or nothing.The eye sees or it doesn't. The wing flies or it doesn't. There are assumed to be no useful intermediates. A cataract patient with the lens of her eye surgically removed can't see clear images without glasses, but can see enough not to bump into a tree or fall over a cliff. Half a wing is indeed not as good as a whole wing, but it is better than no wing at all. The forests are replete with gliding or parachuting animals
A good example is a mountain. One side of the mountain is a vertical cliff, impossible to climb, but on the other side is a gentle slope to the summit. Evolution, goes around the back of the mountain and creeps up the gentle slope to the summit. Most people just see the immense complexity of life, and just think it is impossible, even through millions and millions of years

And even though there is no conclusive science for a designer, it is not a 50/50 question where it could go to either side. If I say there is a microscopic magical unicorn in orbit with the earth that not even the best telescopes can see. No one would be able to prove or disprove my claim for either side, but it is not a 50/50 probability of being true just because there are two choices.
Same could be said for Zeus, Apollo, Amon Ra, Mithras, Baal, Thor, Wotan, the Golden Calf and the Flying Spaghetti Monster.Nobody thinks the hypothesis of their existence is on an even footing with the hypothesis of their non-existence, I just go one god further.

Anyways my beef is not with you guys, since you guys at least have looked into both sides. But you probably are less than 1% of religious people, a huge minority. In reason vs superstition, reason should always triumph, and most people just blindly follow their religion because they were raised in it (and from this is where the ignorance spreads and causes conflicts/wars)