I don't necessarily agree with Russ 100% but he's not using vulgarity and hostility as the forefront to his argument and, for that reason alone, his statements have more clout than do yours I'm afraid. Ease off a bit and try approaching this discussion from a non-emotional point of view. There's no reason to ridicule others.

To look at it from a different perspective, would you say "You're so full of sh**, why don't you f*** off, go to hell" to an African tribesmen who is defending his right to scarification as part of his tribal history? Before you say, "Oh that's different, they're not doing it to infants", please consider I'm not arguing in favor of infant circumsizion. I'm saying the attitude that circumsizion is barbaric is a matter of opinion. If you want to say it's barbaric to do to infants, you might have a pretty good argument (as long as you can do it without aggression.) But if you're just saying the act, itself, is barbaric, you're simply confusing your opinion with fact. There's a lot of people who may think some of the things YOU do are barbaric - and they might even have a pretty solid argument to support that statement too, but it's still just an opinion.

Incidentally, it's possible to reverse the effects of circumcision on your own without any fancy equipment. Have a few google searches on the topic, you'll see what I mean.