Jill, those on here who have not graduated with honors in science does not mean they do not have access to the research of top scientists. So therefore, when you tell me something about evolution, I am quite capable of looking that up from those who are fully qualified. Everybody can have access to this information, student, teacher alike.

By the way, we only have your word for it that you graduated with honors....so I am taking you at face value here and i'll give you the benefit of the doubt considering I sense you are certainly highly intelligent and obviously well educated.

.. if the creation idea was as ludicrous as you seem to believe, why would any evolutionist move into creationism in this day and age where one who does is up for ridicule? Certainly it was not Christianity that moved them....they've spent many years previously in evolution, plus why move away from it when It is far easier to go along with the majority tide, rather than question their theories.... makes life a lot easier. So one could assume at the very least that there must be "something" there to cause them to reconsider or question this theory and that something must have been enough to finally cause them to drop it completely. Took some of them years before that happened. God did not come onboard until later.

Your suggestions here that "Bex, I don't believe that scientists in Montana found 2000 year old T Rex remains.Only in the Flintstones are there humans and dinosaurs hanging out together." So this tells me, far from you being able to prove this wrong, you've simply decided not to believe it at all....so your argument is just your opinion ..... Basically it cannot be so because it does not fit in with your evolutionary time frame....right? So a cartoon has more sway with you on this than any possibility of findings? So man can't travel in space because the Jetsons can?

Jill, when does a mutation add new information? A mutation is just an error of the copying of genes during reproduction. The outcome of a mutation leads to a loss of original information. What has this got to do with new kinds and new genetic information? again the word evolution appears to get a bad name because the evolutionists have applied this word to our origins and suggest that given enough time, one kind can become another...but we have not observed this or have any solid proof it happened. Just speculation. But this speculation is conveniently pushed as fact, which is why evolutionists will speak as though it happened without question.

You are quite correct. Hoaxes do not necessarily cancel out possiblities of real ones coming to light. We await that day.... in the meantime, there is still no verifiable missing link between ape and man, so it remains a theory and should not be taught to students until they can give solid evidence that this was so.. Piltdown man was only an example of many hoaxes of missing links Jill. So evolution is not without agendas, deception and bias. And so far, all we have observed as that all living things reproduce after their own kind.