. Do any of you have any scientific education ?Why do you talk about DNA or the health effects of hg if you don't believe in science . Government and corporations are not part of some vast financially based conspiracy to promote evolution and devalue religion.Religion has always been considered the opiate of the masses because it enables people to accept their situation on earth because they can look forward to heaven.The church will lose billions of dollars in donations when people realize evolution is a fact .
The bible does say that man has been here only a few thousand years and that there were only a few people here at the time of the alleged flood.
If someone is too lazy or has an IQ that can be measured with two significant figures such that they can't study chemistry, organic chem ,biochem ,physics , physical anthropology etc , they should'nt have an opinion on evolution.
I know many chemists , astrophysicists , physicists and other scientists and they are not conformists in any sense and neither am I.
The more I study science, DNA etc, the more I realize that it had to be created. Laws don't make themselves, yet the universe is full of unbreakable ones. Codes such as in DNA don't magically appear. The probability of just one of the many protein chains of DNA forming on its own is considered mathematically (read scientifically) impossible. Some proteins serve as structural materials and others as enzymes. The latter speed up needed chemical reactions in the cell. Without such help, the cell would die. Not just a few, but 2,000 proteins serving as enzymes are needed for the cell’s activity. What are the chances of obtaining all of these at random? One chance in 10 to the 40,000th power “An outrageously small probability,” Hoyle asserts, “that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup.” He adds: “If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction that life originated [spontaneously] on the Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court. However, the chances actually are far fewer than this “outrageously small” figure indicates. There must be a membrane enclosing the cell. But this membrane is extremely complex, made up of protein, sugar and fat molecules. As evolutionist Leslie Orgel writes: “Modern cell membranes include channels and pumps which specifically control the influx and efflux of nutrients, waste products, metal ions and so on. These specialised channels involve highly specific proteins, molecules that could not have been present at the very beginning of the evolution of lifeThe instructinos within the DNA of a cell if written out would fill a thousand 600 page boods (from National Geographic)Yet some "scientists" often skip that observation to analize other evidence. (How is this the pinnacle of deduction?)
Everything that man has been smart enough to create he has copied from Nature, which has done it more beautifully, for thousands of years, and perfectly. No pollution, just perfect system. If it takes a thinking, reasoning brain to copy and implement a design, how much more so was intelligence needed to create it in the first place?
You wouldn't find a camera in the dessert and think it just created itself, someone made it. The human eye is absolutely incomparable to any camera. The human brain is a marvel that will never be understood. Also, we only use a small percentage. Evo occurs from survival of the fittest, why would we develop things we don't need, like such a powerful brain when we don't use it, seeing in color, tasting food, love, joy etc. Why has life managed to create itself in such a perfect way but terminates early?
