As I stated before the term theory in science does not mean a conclusion is speculative . As far as Mr Hovind's offer , who decides if evolution is conclusively proven?
As far as a top scientist who believes in evolution and intelligent design , theres always a few exceptions to the rule.I'm more interested in the analysis rather than his conclusions.
I'm stll waiting for anon 1, 2 or 3 to explain the" law of biogenisis" and thermodynamics as it relates to evolution. When you are done with that how about addressing some of my comments on the quackwatch article if you can.
Evolution is a complicated subject and obviosly it's off (way off) topic here except for the fact that we evolved from single cells a billion years ago who did'nt need dentists because they had no teeth into complex (some not so much) organisms with hg filled teeth.As I said or wrote ,the best discussion , both pro and con , on evoltion is found at talkorigins.com 's posts of the month.