We used a mercury vapor analyzer for our experiments and it happens to be the same make and model the EPA uses for it's measurements.

Anonymous is probably reading to much of the Quackwatch website which is funded by the NCAHF which is a disinformation front for the pharmaceutical industry:

http://www.bolenreport.net/

The fraudulent Quackwatch website is the only place on the web that I found information about mercury vapor analyzers being inaccurate. Of course, I'm sure it will show up on more disinformation websites soon enough.

Remember, the pharmaceutical industry pays people to write bad reviews on important books, and to poison and cause division on forums such as this. I'm not saying Anonymous is one of them, I'm just saying that you never know.

But I say, bring it on. The more disinformation they post, the more rebuttals I have an opportunity to post.

Remember, attacking the accuracy of mercury vapor meters is a last ditch effort because there is nothing more to try and discredit about mercury and it's wide distribution.

Also, if the original post in this thread meant to say that these measurements showed 12 milligrams per cubic meter, that's a lot of mercury; A whole lot of mercury.

We might need some clarification about the unit of measure.

Thanks.