From Dr Hesham El-Essawy.
Re: Tracy.
I have followed Tracy’s attempts at defaming me, and the valiant defence that other contributors mounted on my behalf. I think it is time for some truth in all this.
It is true that I believe that it is not right for me to take the patient’s money for removing his or her amalgam without giving the patient a successful outcome through doing my job properly. I have been safely removing mercury amalgam fillings for the last 17 years and have successfully treated over two thousand patients, all of whom were cured from their many debilitating symptoms.
For professional reasons to do with patient confidentiality I am unable to divulge much detail that might help the reader understand the true reasons behind Tracy’s complaints and her unfair campaign against me. I shall only deal with the points that she chose to make public.
The reason we are so successful in what we do is that we follow a particular system which we arrived at from long experience and from reading our patients, and it is that particular system that Tracy adamantly refused to follow I told her many times that her progress will be slow as we cannot see the whole picture without following our system.
Tracy admits on these pages that she did not take the detox that I prescribed for her (which happened to be the best in the world by the way, as shown by our detailed experiments). She also admits to having bouts of anger, and I have to say her anger was never directed at me except in her writings (I am not even sure that these writings are hers). In my last telephone conversation with her in her mother’s house, which I recorded, she admitted that she had (good few weeks) and that she has improved. What worried her was her fits of anger and her depression, and I again urged her to do things our way so that we can help he, but she again refused.
Tracy claims that I missed spotting her abscessed tooth on the x-ray, and that is not true. It is highly unlikely for a man like me of fourty years experience and of the highest qualifications in the world to miss spotting an abscessed tooth. It is written in her notes so clearly, just as clearly as Tracy’s instructions to me not to do anything other than the removal of her mercury. Even if she wanted me to deal with her abscessed tooth, I would not have done so at the time of amalgam removal (the only time I operated on her).
Tracy refused at every turn to follow my system, claiming that she would not pay money for “unproven” tests. These unproven tests have served us extremely well for the last 17 years and have helped save the lives of many patients. The Vega tests to which she was referring are well established. The 17 vials that I had to give her for sedation was foretold by the Vega test machine that she refuses to recognise (she only agreed to have the abridged test for bio-compatibility when I told her that I will not operate without it for her sakes). She badly needed the full test which she refused to have.
Tracy is claiming that the fillings we placed in her teeth are permanent fillings. Well Tracy, you are wrong again, they are temporary fillings. We never place permanent fillings until the patient sheds the entire body burden of mercury, and we do that to make sure that mercury does not find its way under her permanent fillings. (I think she has unfortunately managed to get herself talked into having permanent fillings rather prematurely).
What surprised me was that the dentists whom Tracy went to see for a second opinion did not realise that they were temporary fillings (perhaps he should be excused, for some of my colleagues jokingly tell me that my temporary fillings are better than their permanent fillings). Frankly, it is difficult for me to believe that a dentist cannot tell a temporary filling from a permanent one!
However, perhaps I should take it as a compliment that neither Tracy nor her new dentist knew that her fillings that I have placed in her teeth were in fact temporary, not permanent (it takes me one and half hours to do one permanent restoration Tracy, how long were you in the chair for? Remember?) My temporary fillings which I placed in Tracy’s teeth were made in a particular way for a particular reason, and a very good one at that.
Before I started treating Tracy I was put under immense pressure by her “side” which made me fear for her life, and made me accept treating her ON HER TERMS, not mine.
Had Tracy accepted treatment on my terms she would have experienced much improvement just as all of the other patients have experienced over the many years we have been helping the mercury toxic patients. Had she accepted treatment on my terms and failed to get results she would have been refunded her money without a question being asked after one year of no successful outcome. But she had her treatment on her own terms and under duress and it has only been a few months since she did.
Tracy will recall that she lied to me on the many emails she sent me (evidence is available). Had she told me the truth about her problems I would have been able to help her, but she and her side seem to have a different agenda!
What truly saddens me is that Tracy has deprived herself of a golden chance to recover her health. I sincerely pity her for her unfortunate choices and her false claims.
Tracy says thatshe would not send her cat to me. I am glad she wouldn't as we do not treat cats!
Dr Hesham El-Essawy
121 Harley Street, London, W1G 6AX
www.el-essawy.comhesham@el-essawy.com 
