Yaeyama chlorella is the best, and I think it is important to have a kind with broken cell walls.

From reading web info on chlorella, it seems to me that there for mercury detox one would want chlorella which [color:"blue"]does not[/color] absorb well in intestina but merely picks mercury and gets out as quickly as possible.

I think that vegeterians and traditional far east users, who wished to absorb the full nutrition of chlorella would want the broken wall variant. But detox users would want the kind that absorbs by intestina as poorly as possible. Who wants chorella to pick the mercury from the gut, then get absorbed by intestina, taken into liver and beyond for its nutritional value to be extracted.

Of course, it may well be that the unbroken wall chlorella will have smaller absorption surface than broken wall one, to pick the mercury. But, even if it picks less of mercury and gets it out, that's still better than picking more, then being easily digested and redistributing the mercury through our organs.

I wonder whether [color:"red"]Andy Cutler[/color], who suggests not to take chlorella at all, has examined what kind of chlorella was being used when the harm occurred.

Also, does anyone know what brands contain [color:"red"]Chlorella pyrenoidosa[/color], which is a better mercury absorber than Chlorella vulgaris, with [color:"red"]unbroken cell walls [/color] ?