It can be a tooth removed by a dentist, not a live tooth, maybe they can do scientific studies where they get a mercury tooth and drop chlorella directly onto it, or zeolites or any other product like cilantro etc etc.

What do people think ? And what do you think would hapen ? They could do a before and after to test the mercury that was absorbed. I mean putting the stuff directly on the tooth. Like i said, not a live tooth in someones mouth, but theres no harm talking about ideas to get rid of the mercury. Or a sulphur supplement or anything else that absorbs it.

Can someone submit this idea to a holistic dentist ?

A biological dentist in my country used NDF on his patients (which is chlorella in another form, easily absorbed and apparently more effective). It also contains some cilantro to and something else. It can be very powerful and may not be suitable for all. If one tries it, they should start at ONE drop and only until certain, should they ever increase it. Healing crisis are not fun! It also depends on the state of a person's gut and liver and if they are not right? YOu can have big big problems with detoxing/chelation.

This is why this dentist would put his patients on a candida diet and give supportive supplements for the organs of elimination, before starting the actual detox protocol for mercury (NDF).

Those WITH amalgams, would also have to do this according to his protocol. But, before they took a dose of NDF, they would be required to brush with a few drops first over all their amalgams and then spit it out. So what you've stated here, fits in.

I'm not sure but I know that is recommended by some to sprinkle chollera onto the teeth directly after amalgam removal to removal amalgam in the mouth. I'm not so keen on ingesting chollera as I think it doesn't agree with some people and can cause redistribution? however sprinkling it onto teeth straight after amalgam removal might actually be a good idea so long as it is not swallowed?? What do others think?

Hi cmlyon, I think that it depends on the person. Some respond to chlorella very well, others do not. It also depends on the elimination organs and whether a person is making sure the toxins that have been mobilised can be handled by the gut and liver and eliminated. If not, redistribution occurs easily. Even then, it can still happen with certain products and with chelation taken randomly.

I know that when I treated my gut by the candida diet, my liver automatically improved from less toxic load. I could then handle chelation with far less symptoms. However, chlorella for me only seeked to mobilise, rather than chelate as much, or I didn't notice it did much at all.....

It depends how accessible the mercury is too, as I'm not sure whether too tightly bound mercury will respond much with chlorella. I feel mercury more tightly bound needs a stronger chelator. The stuff that floats around? Chlorella can mobilise easily, but also bind to it....so it's a combination I think and it again depends on the person.

For me, when I had alot of mercury all over the place, chlorella was a mixed bag of surprises and often nasty ones. Sometimes I felt the difference after using it though, i felt it had indeed stirred up metals nad my body had eliminated some of them, but often through too many intolerable symptoms.

I think it's probably good to just use it in the mouth and on the teeth perhaps....as you said.

Hi Bex,
Thanks for your reply Yes I think you are right about Chlorella. I don't think i want to experiment with ingesting it -- but putting on the teeth after removal could actually be a good idea and one I hadn't even thought of until I read about it recently!