I'm sorry I didn't post this sooner. I just realized that my reluctance was due to my inability to phrase things well. It's awkward trying to explain things any better, but I shall no longer let pride prevent me from presenting this evidence.

Quote
ScienceDaily (Nov. 25, 2009) — When cells are confronted with an invading virus or bacteria or exposed to an irritating chemical, they protect themselves by going off their DNA recipe and inserting the wrong amino acid into new proteins to defend them against damage, scientists have discovered.


The problem is that we lack a term for 'error' which does not imply a mistake. Clearly the alterations are not mistakes at all, but part of a plan.

The research was published in Nature, an overtly pro-evolutionism propaganda venue. One wonders if the same language was employed there. Certainly ideas of this sort are not welcome discoveries.
Quote
"The idea is that methionine can protect you from having oxidation of the active site of protein, which would ultimately completely block function of the protein," Goodenbour said. "You end up reducing the total reactive oxygen species load in the cell. It's a very interesting mechanism."

Cells normally put methionines near important parts of a protein to protect those segments from being damaged by reactive oxygen species. When the cell is under stress, and the amount of ROS increases, the number of methionine "errors" is ramped up tenfold, allowing new proteins to be even more resistant to attack.


At least I'm not the only one having difficulty discussing "errors" which aren't erroneous. Anyhow, here's a link to the article

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091125134701.htm

And here's a blog discussing some implications

http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2009/11/non-genetic-protein-translation.html

I think evidence of this sort speaks for itself. What more can one really say?

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson